Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

From |
Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |

To |
statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |

Subject |
Re: st: Relative Comparision between Observations |

Date |
Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:20:58 +0100 |

For -transaction[2]- (e.g.) you can generate . gen within_2 = inrange(transaction[2], start, end) & isspread Is the number of transactions small enough to allow a variable for every one of them? If so, this is crude but should work forval i = 1/`=_N' { if isspread[`i'] == 0 gen within_`i' = inrange(transaction[`i'], start, end) & isspread } A visceral reaction is that getting the wrong data structure is horribly easy here, but people who work with this kind of data may be able to advise constructively. Nick On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Jens Kruk <chaiselongue@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Nick, > lets say the data looks like this: > > id____isspread____start____end____transaction > 1_____1___________3________6______. > 2_____0___________.________.______5 > 3_____1___________2________5______. > 4_____0___________.________.______5.5 > > > > now what I want Stata to do is to tell me (for example by creating additional variables that contain the ids) that ids 2 and 4 occured between start and end date of observation 1 (5 and 5.5 are between 3 and 6) and that id 2 occured between the start and end date of spread 3 (5 is weakly between 2 and 5). > A perfect result of the procedure would look like this: > > id____isspread____start____end____transaction____tr1___tr2 > 1_____1___________3________6______.______________2_____4__ > 2_____0___________.________.______5______________._____.__ > 3_____1___________2________5______.______________2_____.__ > 4_____0___________.________.______5.5____________._____.__ > > > Best, Jens > > > > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Datum: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:22:19 +0100 >> Von: Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> >> An: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu >> Betreff: Re: st: Relative Comparision between Observations > >> Please show a representative chunk of your data so that precisely what >> are your variables and your observations becomes clear. >> >> Nick >> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:09 PM, <chaiselongue@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> > I want to perform the following task for a very large dataset (so >> writing a Mata loop is probably not the solution): the dataset consists of two >> sorts of data: spreads and transactions. Spreads do have a start and an end >> date, while transactions only have a transaction date. Now I want to know >> whether some transaction happend between the start and end date of a spread. >> Ideally, I would like to have variables containing all the ids of >> transactions that occured between the start and end data of the spread for each >> spread. Is there a way to use inexact matching or merging for this ? >> > This should be a familiar problem, however, I do not have a clue how to >> solve it. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: st: Relative Comparision between Observations***From:*chaiselongue@gmx.de

**References**:**st: Relative Comparision between Observations***From:*chaiselongue@gmx.de

**Re: st: Relative Comparision between Observations***From:*Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com>

**Re: st: Relative Comparision between Observations***From:*"Jens Kruk" <chaiselongue@gmx.de>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: st: xtgee for skewed data** - Next by Date:
**Re: st: multiple imputation and propensity score** - Previous by thread:
**Re: st: Relative Comparision between Observations** - Next by thread:
**Re: st: Relative Comparision between Observations** - Index(es):