The uncertainty coefficient, also called the entropy coefficient, or proficiency, is a measure of the entropy (that is, uncertainty) in a column variable Y which a row variable X explains. It is sometimes expressed in symbols as or U(X|Y) or U(C|R), where C is columns and R is rows.

**Disambiguation Note**: Theil (1970) derived a large part of the uncertainty coefficient, so it’s occasionally referred to as “Theil’s U”. This is a little misleading, because the term *Theil’s U* *usually *refers to a completely different U— the U statistics used in finance. **See**: U: Statistic / Theil’s U.

## Calculating the Uncertainty Coefficient

Uncertainty coefficients range from 0 to 1, inclusive. We can calculate it with the formula:

H(X) is the entropy of a single distribution. Entropy may be any number from 0 to ln(A), where A is the number of data points. A low entropy means very strong correlation; a high entropy implies low correlation and so low uncertainty. The entropy H(X) can be calculated by

The relative entropy of X given Y, H(X|Y), is calculated by

## The Symmetric Uncertainty Coefficient

The uncertainty coefficient discussed is a measure of comparison, and is not symmetric. The symmetric uncertainty coefficient U (also sometimes written U(X,Y)) is what we get when take the weighted average of U(X|Y) and U(Y|X). This would be calculated by:

## Strong Points of the Uncertainty Coefficient

The uncertainty coefficient is primarily used to check how effective or valid a particular statistical algorithm is. Since it verifies correlation, not correctness, it won’t penalize a algorithmic model just because it predicts the wrong class. Instead, it penalizes inconsistency. This means it isn’t affected by the (relative) fractions of the different classes that are set up.

This sets it apart from other ways you might test accuracy, ways such as precision (i.e. positive predicted value) and recall (the true positive rate or sensitivity of a test). The uncertainty coefficient is particularly useful when evaluating clustering algorithms. (These have no particular ordering, and the order blind evaluation of the coefficient allows us to get to the heart of the correlation).

## References

Nehmzow, U. (2006). Scientific Methods in Mobile Robotics: Quantitative Analysis of Agent Behaviour. Springer Science.

SAS Institiute (1999). Measures of Association. Retrieved from http://www.okstate.edu/sas/v8/sashtml/stat/chap28/sect20.htm on Dec 30, 2017

Theil, H. (1970). On the Estimation of Relationships Involving Qualitative Variables. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 76, No. 1 (Jul.), pp. 103-154

**Need help with a homework or test question?** With Chegg Study, you can get step-by-step solutions to your questions from an expert in the field. If you'd rather get 1:1 study help, Chegg Tutors offers 30 minutes of **free tutoring** to new users, so you can try them out before committing to a subscription.

If you prefer an **online interactive environment** to learn R and statistics, this *free R Tutorial by Datacamp* is a great way to get started. If you're are somewhat comfortable with R and are interested in going deeper into Statistics, try *this Statistics with R track*.

**Comments? Need to post a correction?** Please post a comment on our *Facebook page*.

Check out our updated Privacy policy and Cookie Policy